Measuring Granular Flow Through a Funnel with a Force Sensor



This paper presents an apparatus to measure the flow of granular matter through a funnel with a force sensor. In addition to being easily reproducible, our proposed method enhances measurement accuracy from the popular method that uses a stopwatch. We notice, however, that our proposed setup induces an unwelcome force that confounds force sensor readings. This issue is discussed, and its significance on measurement accuracy is evaluated through theoretical and experimental work.


A well-known (and widely used) method of measuring the flow of granular matter through a funnel makes use of a stopwatch. Using the fact that granular flow through a funnel is constant [1], the rate of mass flow is determined by dividing the initial mass of the granular content inside the funnel by the time it takes to empty. While this method provides a great estimate of the flow rate, the time taken for the funnel to empty is recorded with a stopwatch, which relies on one’s reaction time. This method therefore cannot be trusted for its accuracy. Hence, to provide an accurate alternative, we propose a method that makes use of a force sensor.

Apparatus and Procedure

A schematic illustration and photo of our proposed apparatus is depicted in figure 1. The force sensor records the weight of the funnel and its granular content as it flows out the funnel. The data values recorded by the force sensor are divided by gravitational acceleration (g) in order to convert weight into mass. A linear fit is then posed upon the recorded data, and the slope indicates the rate of mass flow.

Figure 1. The apparatus.

An Issue with the Method

Unfortunately, however, the proposed method induces a measurement error. As its granular content flows out of the funnel, the funnel’s center of mass (CM) accelerates downward. As a result, an additional force, caused by CM acceleration, acts in addition to the weight of the funnel and confounds force sensor recordings into a mix of the two forces when weight was the only force we wanted to observe.
This phenomenon, expressed mathematically, is as follows:
where  is the mass flow measured by the force sensor,  is the detected mass flow due to the weight change, and is the mass flow detected due to CM acceleration.
Note that is the real value of mass flow and is the error discussed above. In order for our method to give accurate measurements, needs to equal , and this only happens when  is negligible compared to .

Figure 2. The center of mass (black) shifts downward as granular content (orange) flows out.
To compare with respect to , we introduce ζ, the ratio between  and .
Finding the value of ζ will enable us to determine the significance of and tell us if the issue with our setup is negligible or not. To do so, we model for and .
To find , we first start by modeling , which is the force caused by CM acceleration.
In equation (3), the first term is the mass of the granular content, and the second term is its CM acceleration. Here, is the time it takes for the funnel to empty, t the elapsed time since flow started, V the instantaneous volume of the granular material inside the funnel, the height of the funnel, the vertical position, and A(y) the cross-sectional area as a function of vertical position.
For a funnel,
where  is the radius of the orifice, ρ is the density of the granular content, and is R the ratio between the longer radius and the shorter (orifice) radius.
We plug in equations (4) and (5) into equation (3) and convert  into by taking a time derivative and dividing by g.
And to model , we use a widely accepted law [1].
where C is a dimensionless constant that depends on bulk density. However, as long as the orifice is considerably larger than a single granular particle, C takes on a value near 0.5 [2].
Plugging in equations (6) and (7) into equation (2) gives
Approximating as 0.5 and taking a time average of equation (8) to get rid of the time factor gives the average ratio  as
where  is the initial volume of the granular content.
If  attains a value significantly low, e.g. under 0.01, then , and the issue with our method is negligible.


We demonstrated our method on a PVC funnel (R = 8.25, = 0.8 cm, and = 8.54 cm) with 200mL and 300mL of dry sand (density = 1360 kg/m3). Checking with equation (9) yielded as 0.0018 and 0.0005 for this funnel with 200mL and 300mL of dry sand, respectively. Because the value of is very small, we determined that, for our funnel, accurate measurements are produced.
The results of our demonstration are depicted in figure 3. We removed the force sensor readings at periods before and after the sand was flowing (when weight was constant), divided the recorded weight by g and posed a linear regression on the scatterplot. As a result, both slopes, with a high r-squared value, gave the mass flow rate of this funnel as approximately 65.8 g/s. This result is in good agreement with the mass flow rate we found using a stopwatch, where an average of thirty trials gave 65.4 g/s.

Figure 3: Mass of the granular content versus elapsed time, as recorded by a force sensor.


Using a force sensor, we presented an apparatus to measure the flow of granular matter through a funnel. Concerns about inaccuracies due to CM acceleration were raised, and so we went on a journey to evaluate the issue. Applying our findings in equation (9) on our funnel determined the error to be negligible, and a demonstration further showed that our proposed method produces accurate measurements. However, readers who wish to use this method are encouraged to plug-in parameters of their funnels into equation (9) before fully trusting the accuracy of the method.


The authors are grateful to our teachers Mr. Jaesung Yoon and Ms. Geonjung Yi for providing us with lab space and equipment. Mr. Jaesung Yoon also gave comments that helped to improve our manuscript.

References and Bibliography

[1] Beverloo, W.A., Leniger, H.A., and Velde J. 1961. “The flow of granular solids through orifices.” Chem. Eng. Sci. 15(3-4): 260–269.
[2] Verghese, T.M., Nedderman, R.M. 1995. “The discharge of fine sands from conical hoppers.” Chemical Engineering Science 50(19), 3143–3153.
[3] Redmount, I.H. and Price, R.H. 1998. “The weight of time.” Phys. Teach. 36(7): 432–434.
[4] Mills, A., Day, S., and Parkes, S. 1996. “Mechanics of the sandglass,” Eur. J. Phys. 17: 97.
[5] Tuinstra, F. and Tuinstra, B.F. 2010. “The weight of an hourglass.” Europhys. News 41(3): 25–28.
[6] Janda, I. Zuriguel, and Maza D. 2012. “Flow rate of particles through apertures obtained from self-similar density and velocity profiles.” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108: 248001.
[7] Mankoc, C., Janda, A., Arévalo, R., Pastor, M., Zuriguel, I., Garcimartin, A., and Maza, D. 2007. “The flow rate of granular material through an orifice.” Granular Matter 9: 407.

About the Authors


Junghwan Lee, South Korea

Junghwan Lee is a student in Cheongshim International Academy, scheduled to graduate in 2019. Having first picked up physics in his freshman year, he has expanded his passion for physics through competitions and research experiences. He currently aims to pursue physics at universities.

leejohn24 at csia dot hs dot kr


Kyeong Min Kim, South Korea

Kyeong Min Kim has graduated from Cheongshim International Academy in 2018, and will be matriculating to Oxford University as a physics major. As a physics enthusiast, he has represented South Korea in the International Young Physicists’ Tournament and wrote various research papers himself.

davidkm47 at csia dot hs dot kr


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *